|
|
|
 |

March 5th, 2007, 09:52 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Geo:
Were you trying to resume a broken download from IE/FF? If so, that might not work, because they tend to delete failed download files. If a partial .iso existed somewhere on disk, you should be able to point the torrent at it and get the client to keep whatever pieces of that file pass the hash checks, thus reduce the amount it has to download from the swarm.
You don't necessarily need to save the .torrent file to disk before opening it in a torrent client. You can redownload and restart the same .torrent and resume a partial torrent download (or reseed a completed download), so long as you point it at the existing .iso file (or whatever the torrent contained). Note that most clients save a copy of the .torrent files for future references.
AZ:
Its not so much about resources, as about win32 APIs. If a program is only designed to work with win2k/xp, it probably won't be able to run on win9x no matter what type of system is running the OS. win2k/xp have a lot of system APIs available that were not present in win9x.
|

March 5th, 2007, 11:40 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
uTorrent runs just fine on 98se for me.
__________________
Things you want:
|

March 6th, 2007, 12:24 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
I use utorrent on Win 98 myself (not even 'SE'!) It works great.
|

March 6th, 2007, 01:43 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
What happened to OS/2? A long time ago when I was in university, some of my friends used OS/2 instead of Windows and thought it was great. It looked pretty good but I never used it. Then gradually I stopped hearing much about it and it somehow disappeared.
|

March 6th, 2007, 02:23 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Development of it stopped some time around the turn of the century.
|

March 6th, 2007, 08:34 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
According to this history, OS/2 forked in 1990, and the branch that Microsoft controlled eventually became Windows NT. That page says the other branch had a new release coming in 1999.
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|