|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 9th, 2007, 10:27 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2003 
						Posts: 412
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 Open it again this time as super user:Code: 
 sudo gedit /etc/modules 
 
Add it at the bottom of the list and save like so:
Code: 
 # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
 #
 # This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
 # at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
 
 lp
 ndiswrapper
 
 
 
edit: Why o why has it taken to double spacing stuff inside code tags? It wasn't a few posts ago... |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 9th, 2007, 10:36 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
    
Para, I owe you a beer.    Wireless is workign great now. Thanks for all the help.
 
Geoschmo 
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 9th, 2007, 10:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2003 
						Posts: 412
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 No problem.   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 11th, 2007, 04:55 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: At work or sleeping 
						Posts: 821
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 Wish I'd opened this last week; I have a brand new OEM copy of XP:Pro, still in the cellophane wrapper.
 Oops,
 TT
 
				__________________Aa Turam Empire 
Geekdom is eternal... you will be assimilated... resistance is futile.
                  
A+ Se GdY S++ Fr- C* Cs* Sf- Ai++ Au>M! M- Mp! S@ Ss+ R! Pw+ Fq++ Nd? Rp++ G++ Mm++ Bb-- L-- Tcp
 'We, the weird, chasing the pointless, for no reason at all, have been finding out things that have no effect on anything important for at least a couple days and are now qualified to chase our tails to the merriment of all watching.' -Narf et al
 
"Of course, you don't want to be going about handing out immortality willy-nilly, that just wouldn't be responsible." -O'Shea
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 11th, 2007, 02:34 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Ohio, USA 
						Posts: 4,323
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 What? You could have used Linux instead? Or you would have bought a retail copy of XP at the higher price instead? 
I'll take the XP package if you don't want to use it.    Windows still has its uses. For a while, anyway. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 12th, 2007, 06:08 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: 500km from Ulm 
						Posts: 2,279
					 Thanks: 9 
		
			
				Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Baron Munchausen said: Windows still has its uses. For a while, anyway.
 
 |  Until April, 2014: 
End of extended support for XP prof and home ... .
 
Lets hope Reactos and/or Linux are really usuable by then!
 
(and if anyone else has a wrapped version of XP prof lying around - I would be glad to help him getting rid of it ;-) )
				__________________As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
 ... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 13th, 2007, 04:07 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Burnaby 
						Posts: 995
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 Heh, by 2014 we'll have mobile phones that can run XP fer cryin out loud, and a Vista machine would cost less than a grand.  Still, I'm all in favour of the user-friendly Linux idea.  That'd be sweet. 
				__________________Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
 
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 13th, 2007, 05:23 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 A "vista machine" only costs somewhere in the neighborhood of $600 US, including the ability to run Aero. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 13th, 2007, 07:47 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: CHEESE! 
						Posts: 10,009
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 Aero? Oreo? what do cookies have to do with vista? 
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
Some of my webcomics.  I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				March 13th, 2007, 07:51 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2006 
						Posts: 238
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Windows is too expensive 
 Give Microsoft Oreos and get Vista Aero |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |