Afterthought - (Winner: Baalz as R'yeh!)

[Kojusoki]

good idea... when are we going to start?

[Velusion]

Kojusoki said:
good idea... when are we going to start?

Once all the gods are uploaded

[Methel]

Using sheps "rules" of diplomacy this time please?
the fallout becouse of the somewhat rigid rules of last game had me worried.

[Velusion]

Methel said:
Using sheps "rules" of diplomacy this time please?
the fallout becouse of the somewhat rigid rules of last game had me worried.

I'm not sure what you are talking about...

[Jazzepi]

WSzaboPeter and I had a disagreement over the terms of our NAP. Since the rules for the game were that "you must obey treaties" instead of Shep's rules, it created some tension. Ultimately, WSzaboPeter ended up leaving the game.

I, personally, never want to play a "you must obey treaties" game again. Shep's rules are much simpler in that there are no headaches from disagreements over what an NAP stands for. If you disagree with the other person, then you simply break the pact. No need for rules lawyering.

Jazzepi

[Vathmoth]

Hi,

If one of the two missing players don't send their passwords, may I play one of those nations? My email is Vathmoth@gmail.com

Thanks

[tromper]

hahah, after reading this supposed 'code of conduct', I'm still chuckling.

It begins with a 'do anything you want and break any treaty you feel like breaking, at any time, because you want to win at all costs and so does everyone else' sort of vibe, and then follows up with an 'if you promise to trade something, you'd better trade it or you're being a jerk'. Makes no sense to me.

Personally, I'd prefer to play with honest people that respect treaties. There are myriad other ways to 'backstab'. *shrug* It's up to Velusion and you guys though of course.