|
|
|
|
 |

June 26th, 2007, 08:05 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
3.08 was supposed to make a hail of arrows effective against glamour and thus offer more nations a less extreme (in terms of design points, strat, overall cost) counter to vans.
Clearly Jazzepi feels mislead - saying "well archers aren't the counter to heavy cavalry" just demonstrates that the van nerf might not have changed them much, since the big alteration was for missiles vs glamour.
|

June 26th, 2007, 08:56 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Sombre said exactly what was on my mind.
Jazzepi
|

July 2nd, 2007, 07:59 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Quote:
Sombre said:
3.08 was supposed to make a hail of arrows effective against glamour and thus offer more nations a less extreme (in terms of design points, strat, overall cost) counter to vans.
Clearly Jazzepi feels mislead - saying "well archers aren't the counter to heavy cavalry" just demonstrates that the van nerf might not have changed them much, since the big alteration was for missiles vs glamour.
|
You would expect the glamour nerf to roughly double the number of hits against Vans, but an E9 bless will reduce the number of hits by something like a factor of 2.5, as well as reducing the damage when an arrow does manage to hit. I'm still kind of surprised the archers did "nothing" to the Vans.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|

July 2nd, 2007, 10:24 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Max! Hello, haven't seen you around for a while. Been on holiday?
|

July 2nd, 2007, 04:33 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Quote:
llamabeast said:
Max! Hello, haven't seen you around for a while. Been on holiday?
|
Hi! I had to swear off Dominions for a month while I finished my spring term classes. Now I'm done with coursework and have only my master's thesis to go, so I've permitted myself a bit of fun again. Good to see things are still stable here.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|

July 7th, 2007, 11:04 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Just my two cents on the subject: I agree that total balance cannot be achieved in a specific part of the game: some nations are better for the start of a game (when battles are important to set your initial borders), others are better in the long run (when there is a large empire running).
I don't have that much experience with vanheim, I always thought that Neifelheim was the BEST nation: Niefel Giants with W9N6(+) bless were invincible. warhammer above makes a good point about diplomacy but it is only (half-)supported for MultiPlayer games.
In general, I think that it is good to have different styles in the nations: although this may make them unbalanced, some players may get a far more better playing experience with a style they like more. This variety also increases diplomacy and cooperation in multiplayer games, while in single player... come on, the AI is not _that_ good yet, you can take any nation in the long run if you play carefully.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|