Global War (use new thread pls)

Cerlin · #1 March 28th, 2008, 05:14 PM

Moderation! It is good to see you here! after all your strong defense of honor and "right" on these forums its thematic!

IndyPendant · #2 March 28th, 2008, 05:56 PM

Ha! I had logged back in to check to see if I could change my nation from Neutral MA Ermor to Good MA Ulm. Doh! If you ever change your mind, CUnknown, I'd like to switch. ; ) Otherwise, I'll stay as I am.

Suggestion: Allow good nations to trade *away* any death gems and/or blood slaves to the neutral nations?

quantum_mechani · #3 March 28th, 2008, 06:22 PM

Quote:

IndyPendant said:

Suggestion: Allow good nations to trade *away* any death gems and/or blood slaves to the neutral nations?

Slave trading sounds a bit evil.

The idea for evil nations is interesting, but I think it might be a bit to complicated, on top of the current game system. I'm also not sure neutrals really need a bunch of watchers.

IndyPendant · #4 March 28th, 2008, 06:38 PM

I love Drake49's idea for the evil nations each having a secret foe! It's perfect to help keep them sufficiently paranoid! Edit: And yes, I agree all communications restrictions should remain as-is.

And note for my own idea, the good nations still could not deliberately generate blood slaves, for example. Only trade whatever (rare) slaves they happen to generate. But yes, I do see the point of it not being exactly good to do so...

I hate the idea of banning death and blood for everyone, though. Don't think that will pass, but if we did that, I wouldn't even be able to play MA Ermor at all.