|
|
|
 |
|

March 31st, 2008, 02:31 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 72
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
Ulm has turned AI with no provinces left.
|

March 31st, 2008, 04:08 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
Arcos streak of misfortune continues with a rebel general who left the capital with the entire legion (eg I somehow accidentally ordered him out) and stumbled onto a huge TC raiding party. The 4th Legion was decimated. We expect the capital will fall as soon as the barbarians get wind that it is undefended.
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|

March 31st, 2008, 04:45 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Turn 29
Thanks for the game Dedas!
|

March 31st, 2008, 06:53 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 72
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
Thank YOU Jurri. 
|

March 31st, 2008, 08:39 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 410
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Turn 29
The Coalition of the Violitional have brought the eeebil Reign of Vampire Counts to an end. And stuff.
GG Dedas.
|

April 1st, 2008, 02:48 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
Great Khan Huo has issued the following response:
Calling the Hoard, one of the mightiest mortal land armies in the world a 'raiding party' is typical of the 'civilized' nation of Arco's arrogance towards the Barbarian Kings. This began when Arco attacked the Hoard without warning, and compounded the insult by not inflicting ANY damage with their surprise attack. At least the insults of Arco against the Barbarian Kings will soon end.
Out of character, Arco made a number of mistakes this game that are typically made by players that are not putting enough time in their turns... and Arco was indeed in two end-games. Arco spent little time on this game, and with it over, is now free to focus on his new game. Instead of splitting time and playing several games, badly. Only very experienced playes can deal with multiple end-games at once without spending alot of time, and sometimes not even them.
PS:
I am new to this game, but not games in general. I've played others, thought this is the most impressively detailed. And I don't think bad choices should be eliminated.
You know what "balance" is? The inability to make mistakes.
|

April 1st, 2008, 04:58 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
I am not sure I understand the point of your post.
I am playing in a number of games at different stages and doing well in most. Just because I am on my way out in Alexander doesn’t mean I am “not putting enough time in my turns” or am “splitting time and playing several games, badly”. At least two other players went out before me – does that mean they weren’t putting enough time into their turns?
I actually have put time into trying to make this game entertaining / engaging with forum posts despite some strategic mistakes, such as trying to help Ulm while engaged in a war with Jomon.
That decision wasn’t a rash one, but rather based on a good relationship with Ulm, and the fear of letting TC take Ulm unchecked. It turned out Ulm was much weaker than I expected, put up no fight, and it turned out to be a bad move. But it wasn’t made thoughtlessly.
Now Caelum has ended its NAP and with me, I am still fighting Jomon, Ulm has fallen, and TC has a huge horde of barbarian cavalry, there is really little hope.
Note: Having the troops move out of my fort this last turn was certainly a mistake and I am not sure how it happened. It may have been accidentally clicking on a province to check troops/details without realizing all my troops were highlighted. That was a mistake (first time it has happened to me) but does not mean I have not taken this game seriously.
I am not sure I interpreted your post correctly (and if I didn’t then excuse me), but I don’t really appreciate your comments.
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|

April 1st, 2008, 07:41 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
I agree that Drake's comments are probably best made privately, assuming I am not misunderstanding them, too. Please, let's keep things friendly here. 
|

April 1st, 2008, 07:53 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 410
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Turn 29
+1 Pasha.
Sometimes we need to be reminded that it we need to maintain separation between the game personailities/actions and the individual, or we would all be mortal enemies in RL!
|

April 1st, 2008, 10:41 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Turn 29
Well, if you are offended by Great Khan Huo, please understand that he impaled his last 'social graces' teacher and we have yet to find a replacement.
However, my comments that you seem distracted in this game, maybe because of other games, or maybe because of Real Life, well I believe that is what happened. This has happened, at one time or another, to half or more of the board. I don't really see how this is an insult. You used good tactics one battle, next battle no tactics.
The bottom of my post actually wasn't addressed to you but a general comment that popped out of my head right then. Sorry if it offended you, rereading it, it doesn't make much sense in context.
Anyway, if you still upset about the MoD cheat, well I think I can agree with everyone else and say it is a cheat, and I'm sorry it happened to you.
I apologize for Great Khan Huo, because he certainly isn't going to apologize, but would like to add that you trying to agitate the rest of the world to attack him, made him a little mad. With cause.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|