|
|
|
 |

May 30th, 2002, 11:05 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
I think the obsession over this fairly trivial issue is a sign that we've become too familiar with the game as a whole.  It's time for MM to add some new options. Either new damage types or weapon abilities or some other new feature that can be used to make the game less predictable and renew interest in the over-all game instead of people nit-picking at damage stats.
|

May 30th, 2002, 11:56 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Hear Hear Barron. The style of play is important, as well as diplomacy. If a faction uses ultimate weapons, the rest of the community should side against them.
Please, this is only a thoughtfull, if uninformed, opinion. But what better way to get response?
__________________
What is our aim? ...Victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; without victory, there is no survival. - Winston Churchill, 1940
Chardo deeply bows to Sir Churchill's memory
|

May 31st, 2002, 12:23 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
hey the victor always writes history.
I agree with you baron. I know the game very well.
Scary thing is that I am still learning it.
The 20000 units has really changed the style of game.
The PPB ship is still powerful. But the unit counters them easily
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|

May 31st, 2002, 12:36 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
So, we should send an email to MM saying we're all tearing our hair out at how boring the game has become and please add something quick?
Mounts restrictable by tech levels would be good.
And/or mounts for shields and armor.
Multiple weapon damage types for a single weapon, too.
Then add new abilities like 'Double damage to Shields' and 'Half damage to shields' so weapons can have both advantages and disavantages.
|

May 31st, 2002, 02:23 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Uranus
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
I totally agree with Baron M.
LOL!!!
We want more STUFF!!
|

June 1st, 2002, 07:34 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
Posts: 521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Seriously it isn't that overpowered. All games have something that just does wonders. Can't remember if it was Mech Inf or somethign before that in Civ2 but its just something you have to deal with. And believe me it can be dealt with. As easily as most other new inventions.
__________________
Come join the forces of democracy and fight for independence from Totalitarianism, Dictatorships, Emperors and Empresses, Oligarchys and Fundamentalists at SE4 by Committee
|

June 1st, 2002, 08:08 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Very well, i dont know. After a lot of thinking i agree that major changes to the weapon might hurt the game too much. Still, it is a powerful weapon and is too easy to research early on bringing you great advantage. So i still think it should be changed - either by decreasing damage a little or increasing the research cost.
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|