To Tien Chi:
1) We never had a NAP, altough Pangaea twice asked Tien Chi for one
2) Tien Chi demanded Pangaea to attack Marverni when we were not prepared, but in the name of mutual friendship Pangaea complied
3) When Pangaea then did attack, Marverni went AI and Tien Chi did immediatly pull out of the war to fight Formoria, leaving Pangaea alone to fight Marverni
4) At this point Pangaea informed whatever alliance we had reagarding Marverni would be now considered void, because it was apparent Tien Chi just had wanted somebody to attack Marverni while itself could focus on Fomoria. Again Pangaea asked for a NAP, but Tien Chi ignored it once again.
5) Pangaea has only taken lands from Marverni plus the one province back which had previosly been "accidently" conquered from Pangaea (funny thing how those accidents seem to happen regularily to some). Pangaea has never attacked Tien Chi lands.
6) After Pangaea had finally trashed Marverni, Tien Chi saw it fit to demand lands it never would have had a chance to conquer. Pangaea didn't even bother to answer such rubbish.
Tien Chi may be last in research, but funnily enough that doesn't prevent them to field dozens of combat mages to the field. A more suspicious mind might actually believe those two facts are somehow connected...
Notice: Tien Chi has *not* broken any NAP when the suprise attack on Pangaea began, simply because we never had a NAP. Foolishly I have however believed Tien Chi to be a friend of Pangaea, and that is why this sudden assault feels so nasty. I really thought I would be smarter than fall for the oldest trick in the book, but seems that was not the case this time
Re: Magellan: All-EA Nations CBM game, 3D spherical map, Running
Threaded Mode