|
|
|
|
 |

October 10th, 2009, 12:05 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Taxing
You're the one that's wrong Executor. Taxes are reset when a province is captured, meaning your entire post is erroneous.
|

October 10th, 2009, 12:43 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Me a viking
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 81
Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Taxing
I want my minute and 48 seconds back right now!
__________________
Voice of ***** and her spicy crew!
|

October 10th, 2009, 12:49 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 827
Thanks: 23
Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Taxing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantomen
I want my minute and 48 seconds back right now!
|
Apologies from my behalf, you can have your (108sec/9 posts = 12 sec per post) 12sec back. There you go.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Quitti For This Useful Post:
|
|

October 10th, 2009, 03:34 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
Thanks: 21
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Taxing
I did some testing and:
Without any taking of provinces:
Treasury(i+1) = Treasury(i) + income(i) - upkeep(i+1)
That is, each turn treasury is increased (or decreased) with the difference of last turn's income and this turn's upkeep.
When nation A takes a province from nation B:
Nation B gets income reduced by the amount the taken province earned (as expected).
Nation A gets income increased by an amount that I could not determine. It is not:
a) the amount nation B lost
b) the amount that the province shows as income when captured
c) the amount of income the province would have with the new owner and taxes set to what the previous owner set (including taxes set at 100%)
|

October 10th, 2009, 04:17 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,133
Thanks: 25
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: Taxing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho
I did some testing and:
Without any taking of provinces:
Treasury(i+1) = Treasury(i) + income(i) - upkeep(i+1)
That is, each turn treasury is increased (or decreased) with the difference of last turn's income and this turn's upkeep.
When nation A takes a province from nation B:
Nation B gets income reduced by the amount the taken province earned (as expected).
Nation A gets income increased by an amount that I could not determine. It is not:
a) the amount nation B lost
b) the amount that the province shows as income when captured
c) the amount of income the province would have with the new owner and taxes set to what the previous owner set (including taxes set at 100%)
|
therefore, if nation A takes province b from nation B on turn t, and sets taxes to 200% on turn t, but then nation B retakes province b on turn t + 1, nation B does not get income(taxes = 200%), but rather gets some as of yet to be determined amount. thus, it is worthwhile to set taxes to 200% whenever a province is captured for which the capturing nation doesn't expect to hold for more than t + k turns, where k is a small constant under which it is worthwhile for the capturing nation to set taxes to 200% for?
OK. makes perfect sense.
|

October 10th, 2009, 04:47 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
Thanks: 21
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Taxing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omnirizon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho
I did some testing and:
Without any taking of provinces:
Treasury(i+1) = Treasury(i) + income(i) - upkeep(i+1)
That is, each turn treasury is increased (or decreased) with the difference of last turn's income and this turn's upkeep.
When nation A takes a province from nation B:
Nation B gets income reduced by the amount the taken province earned (as expected).
Nation A gets income increased by an amount that I could not determine. It is not:
a) the amount nation B lost
b) the amount that the province shows as income when captured
c) the amount of income the province would have with the new owner and taxes set to what the previous owner set (including taxes set at 100%)
|
therefore, if nation A takes province b from nation B on turn t, and sets taxes to 200% on turn t, but then nation B retakes province b on turn t + 1, nation B does not get income(taxes = 200%), but rather gets some as of yet to be determined amount. thus, it is worthwhile to set taxes to 200% whenever a province is captured for which the capturing nation doesn't expect to hold for more than t + k turns, where k is a small constant under which it is worthwhile for the capturing nation to set taxes to 200% for?
OK. makes perfect sense.
|
Exactly.
I just wish I could find a formula for the undetermined amount.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|