|
|
|
 |

October 26th, 2002, 10:36 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
There are two things I would like to see in the newest patch.
1) the option of excluding certain tech areas from research if a player has a particular racial tech already selected (very useful to avoid the  or system: in many mods), and
2) the change in refueling at starbases modified (again). It would be useful and justifiable if a ship that Mothballs and then is eventually Unmothballed at a base gains its full supplies. I think that is a reasonable workaround. It still puts ships out of play for a least a turn, costs a small amount of resources for the Unmothballing, and hoses crew experience. All justified by the nature of base drydock, and manditory crew reassignment (or just awesome shoreleave). But it still allows deepspace bases to be used (as they should be) as rallying points for conquest.
Combat Squirrel
[ October 27, 2002, 01:50: Message edited by: CombatSquirrel ]
|

October 27th, 2002, 03:40 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,022
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
I'm sure it has already been said, but I'd still love to see worm holethat have a time delay between systems (the jump will take an extra turn to arrive at destination) and see worm holesthat will automatically close after a set number of turns. (After the ship opens the worm hole it can only sustain it for x # of turns, then it colapses).
That and voice commands 
|

October 27th, 2002, 04:04 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 442
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Quote:
Originally posted by Nodachi:
I'd like to see mounts that can add an ability to a component.
|
Oh HELL yeah! I'd LOVE to turn the Talisman into a MOUNT. The more guns you have benefitting from the Talisman's effects, the more it costs you ... !
Quote:
I don't know if this could work but how about the ability to use more than one mount?
|
It could be done, IMO. Instead of a "choose one" drop-down list, a "tick-box" list like in empire options.
The difficulty there would be, to prevent using Large -and- Massive mounts for the same weapon; a "restricted mount(s)" field would have to be added, or a "mount family" field and only allow one mount of a given family number (once you pick one, grey out the rest, for example).
Quote:
Mounts that could affect the ROF of a weapon would be good.
|
Hell yes, again. For example, a "Rapid Fire" mount that cuts damage by 2/3, but also cute ROF by 50% (round UP, so half of 3 is 2) ...
Quote:
A restricted field add to the tech areas. Ex; You have tech A, you can research tech B or tech C, you choose B and now you can not research C. This would add a new element for modders to work with.
|
I'd LOVE this. I'd also like to see the Restricted Trait fields (etc) in RacialTraits.txt made to work ...
__________________
-- Sean
-- GMPax
Download the Small Ships mod, v0.1b Beta 2.
|

October 27th, 2002, 08:14 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 346
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
One thingnthat I would like to see is for the emotionless trait to be fixed. Tis supposed to provide a flat +20% bonus and stay there. Instead it merely freezes the pop happiness at current level.
I had thought that this bug was fixed but I was playing a SE4-1.78 Proportions game and managed to take an enemy homeworld after a sustained siege. Imagine my supprise when I noticed that my spoils of war were frozen at -100%!!
There was nothing I could do. I tried replacing the population, and even tried scouring it with neutron bombs, but in the end I just had to scrap it and move on.
My wrath was legandary.
__________________
I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but I know that World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
-Albert Einstein
|

October 28th, 2002, 01:55 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
a blockade strategy. a fleet goes to a planet kills all of its defenses but after the defenses are down the ships just blockade the planet. this would be very useful when trying to force another empire to surrender but they wont. Jst blockade their Last planet and just wait. they cant do anything.
__________________
The Ring!
|

October 28th, 2002, 03:08 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: PALMDALE ,CA ,US
Posts: 162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
DAVID G wrote; If MM implements even a small fraction of these suggestions he is god! I wonder if we could narrow it down to some things we really want. Perhaps make a list of 10 to 20 things then we could vote on the ones we'd most like to see?.
Oh yes, I remember JIMBOB doing a poll like that.
|

October 28th, 2002, 05:54 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Yah, and then I did the stupidest thing ever...
procrastinated.
I've still got all the data though.
Should I resurect the final analysis for y'all?
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|