|
|
|
 |
|

January 7th, 2009, 08:30 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombre
Well shields don't actually give defence (or I guess they might, but not through parry), it's just the misleading way it displays on the unit screen. Actually I think several shields reduce defence.
|
I know, but for our purposes it doesn't matter. The fact that the shield of gleaming gold is better at deflecting *arrows* because it's shiny is actually even weirder than if it boosted defense directly.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|

January 8th, 2009, 02:10 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxWilson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombre
Well shields don't actually give defence (or I guess they might, but not through parry), it's just the misleading way it displays on the unit screen. Actually I think several shields reduce defence.
|
I know, but for our purposes it doesn't matter. The fact that the shield of gleaming gold is better at deflecting *arrows* because it's shiny is actually even weirder than if it boosted defense directly.
-Max
|
Silver Hauberk works the same way. I presume it's so shiny arrows can't see it and go right past.
|

January 7th, 2009, 06:21 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
I came up with the effect first, liked it, and now I'm trying to come up with an explanation.
In this case, the armor's increased defense comes from different focus. This only applies on Jomonese, not Japanese, armors, but I imagine the the armor would be designed so it doesn't hinder the usage of the samurai's preferred weapon. Samurai Armor + broadsword/buckler equals defense penalty, but Samurai Armor + katana does not. Other nations' armor isn't as specialized, because some use swords, others use morningstars, some only use spears, they use different shields etc etc.
|

January 7th, 2009, 07:29 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
I guess it's how you thing about the shield affecting defense. I think shields give additional defense equal to the parry value, but on a shield hit, you still get damaged, minus the protection of the shield.
Even though Lead Shields have good protection, their low parry value means that they are rarely hit, so they don't help much in melee. A Shield of the Accursed should eat a whole lot of hits for you because of the high parry.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

January 7th, 2009, 08:14 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Yes but the parry is only added to defence on melee rolls. It doesn't help against earthquakes, when being trampled etc. In fact with a tower shield for example, it gives a malus to your 'real' defence value in these situations. When compared with weapons and armour, which give defence bonus or malus in all situations, the parry value from shields doesn't come across as 'real' defence.
I personally think the way it's displayed just confuses people.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sombre For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 7th, 2009, 11:44 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Thanks, I see what you mean now. And it's nice the way the mechanics are implemented, since it makes sense you can't jump out of the elephant's way with that big steel tower shield strapped to your arm!
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

January 8th, 2009, 06:26 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 792
Thanks: 28
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
The defence/parry will reflect that the glare partially blinds the archer or melee unit, I imagine, making them hard to target. Although that does leave a logic gap about why it still works against blind units.
|

January 8th, 2009, 08:37 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Who says the shield of gleaming gold is better at parrying arrows because it's shiny? It's just that it's a magic shield.
The only reason people associate shields and defence at all is the way it's displayed on the unit screen. If weapon damage was added on to strength in the display you'd get the same thing there. Fortunately it isn't, so it's less confusing.
|

January 8th, 2009, 08:53 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombre
Who says the shield of gleaming gold is better at parrying arrows because it's shiny? It's just that it's a magic shield.
The only reason people associate shields and defence at all is the way it's displayed on the unit screen. If weapon damage was added on to strength in the display you'd get the same thing there. Fortunately it isn't, so it's less confusing.
|
Pretty sure they mean the Shield of Valor, which gives you Air Shield (like the also mentioned Silver Hauberk).
The irony being that in many cases, these missiles are fired somewhat "blind" anyways, just arced in the general direction of potential enemies..... Yet they miss the pretty armor every time. 
|

January 8th, 2009, 01:50 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: If Giants existed in BC times...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombre
Who says the shield of gleaming gold is better at parrying arrows because it's shiny? It's just that it's a magic shield.
|
The description strongly implies that the shininess is what gives it its high parry. You'll see the same thing for other high-parry shields like the Shield of the Accursed (?). High parry also gives good missile protection.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|