Tactical CS?

[thatguy96]

Do you think that it would be possible to crank the numbers up sufficiently that the weapon still wouldn't kill but would actually have a lasting effect? Like put more highly motivated troops into a more serious retreat and simply disperse troops with low morale ratings?

[Listy]

yeah I'm still about.

It even worked quite well. especialy Rubber batton guns Etc.

[PlasmaKrab]

IIRC what was used for a lasting effect comparable to tear gas canisters and so on, was to put these CS weapons to a Flame or Napalm weapon class.
This means that the targetted hex will be set on fire, and that the targetted inf unit or others will suffer heavier suppression when attempting to cross it.

You should try raising the WHS rating, maybe that would give you more smoke/crater effect and therefore more lasting area damage, in a way, but I doubt that you can raise the unit suppression without actually raising the kill rate.

[Listy]

CS where napalm weapons, as that slaps massive suppression numbers on the target, and as Plasma says it leaves a lasting effect that spews smoke down range.

The batton round guns where Large cal guns with a huge Warhead and weapon size but a HEK of 0.

[Mustang]

As long as the unit you are attacking has a very low rally rating (or even a rally rating of 0), this CS idea works because the target never recovers from the supression. This is realistic. Tear gas will wear off after several minutes. As each MBT turn is three minutes, it wouldn't be ridiculous if a unit recovered from the effects of the CS after 2 or so turns.

[thatguy96]

Well CS is relatively persistant, which is why it was developed over CN which is not. CN was also often combined with DM to get a more immediate effect that would be harder to recover from in a short span. The napalm idea is good because it leaves a lasting effect on the hexes, and because most riot-control gas weapons work by either bursting or burning the filler, the resulting fire it not completely ridiuclous.

There seems to be a general concensus that this can be done. However, does it seem plausible that people would use units from a modified OOB that had weapons that didn't kill people with any consistancy? Or would this just be something for scenario designers? I guess that would be interesting, militants besiege a group of peace-keepers and you have to race to their aid because of the fact that they don't have a large number of lethal weapons, or some such situation.

Also, Listy, what weapons did you model beyond the the baton gun (that seems to be relatively obvious, I'm guessing that was supposed to be a 37mm launcher of some sort)? The weapons I were thinking of for this kind of thing would be hand grenades, 2.75" rockets, and CBUs. I guess one could also attempt to model the XM96 rocket for the XM191 and M202 66mm launchers.

Listy would it be possible to post the data or send me the OOBs so I could see where people were the last time this was looked at?

[Listy]

My UK OOB on here, somewhere has baton guns in some squads.

I think I had them in COIN patrols of 2x Snatch rover 2x 4 man squads with a baton gun. I also did a senario, based on a story a friend told me from Iraq, to show off the unit. However the AI movement routines, or lack there of, scuppered that senario.

It had a large angry mob surrounding a pair of broken down vehicles carrying contractors. A Pair of Snatch rovers where sent in to get them out, then they came under attack from armed badies.

The Idea was that you had to have iorn control over your weapons, only useing the baton gun on area fire to disperse the crowd alowing you to push in to pick up the contractors. if you left your weapons switched on, then you'd have a massaacre on your hands...

The CS was along long time ago, even maybe shown in an OOB posted on the old yahoo groups.

I did Get Sheilder and JP233 working just fine though!