|
|
|
|
 |

June 30th, 2007, 02:52 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
Quote:
Meglobob said:
As anyone come up with some good uses for the Gift of Kurgi given those harsh drawbacks or is the wielder ultimately doomed to die?
|
The biggest drawback is the auto-feebleminded and further hit to MR. On the positive side you get flying, ethereal, luck, and a lot of + defense. The best use I've heard of for it is on a heroic mr no-magic hero from ritual of rebirth.
|

June 30th, 2007, 02:55 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
It doesn't cause feeble-mindedness any more. That's been replaced by insanity.
As for what it does, Flying, Etherealness, Luck, +8 Defense and it can be used to cast Send Lesser Horror.
|

June 30th, 2007, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
The manual says,"Extra attack, luck, ethrealness, fly, cursed, fear+25, spell  d lesser horror, dangerous, automatic call horror at start of battle, curses weilder, slight chance of horror mark"
A couple of points here, its got alot of powerful effects, so you could make a temporary powerful SC but it would be a good idea to pull the rest of the equipment off him at some point and just lose the gift?!?
If you gain horror marks, the automatic horror at battle start is going to attack the gifts weilder, so you need to be able to easily defeat horrors.
You could just equip a expendable character and just use the send horror spell each turn until horror attacked.
It costs 40 blood slaves, is it worth it?
Also why have so many of the unique artifacts got drawbacks?
|

June 30th, 2007, 05:30 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
> Also why have so many of the unique artifacts got drawbacks?
Because I bought the rpg Powers and Perils sometimes in the 80's!
---
OK, that was not entirely fair!
Named Items (unique artifacts) in that game came with a drawback. It could be anything from not being usable unless under certain circumstances to lethal effects like cunsuming the bearers will or life force.
In literature the same phenomenon is also not unheard of. The One Ring and Stormbringer are clearly not beneficial to the bearer.
All in all I find it fitting and fun, and it makes it more difficult to make an uber SC or something similar. I actually dislike powerful items without drawbacks. Too easy to make winner strategies that way. Less fun thematically. Less fun incidents with insane commanders 
|

June 30th, 2007, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
I'm glad many of the powerful items have interesting drawbacks.
Jazzepi
|

June 30th, 2007, 06:14 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
We have a Winner! 
|

June 30th, 2007, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
Quote:
Kristoffer O said:
> Also why have so many of the unique artifacts got drawbacks?
Because I bought the rpg Powers and Perils sometimes in the 80's!
|
No this is more than fair enough.
I bought book of traps 1,2 and 3. The next 2 entire groups of adventurers died in hideous fashion. I finally relised I was being too harsh, when in a constantly shifting maze, filled with trap, after trap the 3 remaining members of my adventuring party commited suicide rather than take another step.
I was then promptly sacked as gm for a year...and I only got the gig back after selling my books of traps at auction at a roleplaying convention... 
|

June 30th, 2007, 06:17 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
Sounds like a fair sacking
But you should have kept the book (hidden).
|

June 30th, 2007, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
Quote:
Kristoffer O said:But you should have kept the book (hidden).
|
Nah thats no fun, one of my favourite tricks was to descibe the setting then pick up a book of traps and 'accidently' let a bit show above the GM shield, no traps there of course. Another was put a perfectly mundane item in a treasure hoard and leaf through, encyclopedia magica, whenever they examined that item. 
|

July 1st, 2007, 04:20 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: \"Dangerous\"?
I'm a big fan of the old-school dnd methodology that KO is using, that great power comes at a price. As that flavor goes, most artifacts were designed to be used by a deity of one sort of another, and in anyone else's hands were too much for them.
Something to consider:
Perhaps in this vein pretenders or the demon lords may suffer less drawbacks from the artifact class items?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|