|
|
|
 |

October 3rd, 2007, 03:17 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 785
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
I know they are not the best, but does anybody like cavemen? They have elemetal reisitance, good strength and fair attack with fair hp.
I like the commanders b/c thier worst weakness is lack of armor and you can fix that. The troops arn't bad with Mass Protection or Arrow fend, though they are a tad bit expensive.
What about the horse brothers? I don't like them, I prefer regular archers b/c they are cheaper and eat less. Does anyone use them? If not seems like a waste of a magic site.
__________________
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
|

October 3rd, 2007, 05:49 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
I like Horse Brother commanders to ferry troops on larger maps. They may only get MP 2 on the way to the front due to the troops they lead. But the get MP 3 on the way back.
|

October 3rd, 2007, 08:33 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 509
Thanks: 84
Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
I've sworn off horse archers in general. They are either a really expensive short bow or a really weak cavalry unit, but either way it's a poor use of gold. The commanders are definitely good though.
|

October 4th, 2007, 10:58 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 724
Thanks: 93
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
I do like caveman commanders if I give them the boots that boost strength, the bow that has strength dependent damage (whichever one that is) and orders to fire rear. These are all early game attainable which is the primary reason I like them. I gotten quite a few caveman commanders into the HOF with this combination.
__________________
Men do not quit playing because they grow old; they grow old because they quit playing.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
|

October 5th, 2007, 09:52 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
One note about the Hoburgs - they're perhaps the only way of getting crossbowmen in Early Age. That makes them even better than usual.
|

October 5th, 2007, 12:05 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
OTOH crossbows are less important in the early era. Longbows are generally better.
|

October 5th, 2007, 12:24 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: EA hoburgs and other elite neutrals
> OTOH crossbows are less important in the early era. Longbows are generally better.
One on one, yes. But remember that you can get 2 hoburg crossbows for 14/8, when
a longbow costs 12/7. It's about two on one. While heavy armour is less common
in the early age, two crossbows are still better than one longbow, especially
after Flaming Arrows get brought in the equation, and that is common in early era.
Still, I would rather find elephants. :-)
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|