|
|
|
 |

November 20th, 2007, 04:22 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA. USA
Posts: 220
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Eliminating a scorched earther=poor sportsmans
Reverend Zombie for the win!
|

November 20th, 2007, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Eliminating a scorched earther=poor sportsmans
That's way I've always viewed scorched earth. Yes the gains are less but it's also significantly easier to conquer a nation with no forts, no labs, no mages ...
|

November 21st, 2007, 09:08 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Eliminating a scorched earther=poor sportsmans
i dont have the game yet. but from my point of view, from other games, i would rather say a scorched earth player is the bad mannered one.
i think it is bad mannered to delay and weaken a clear winner without having any chance to win yourself. pillaging your provinces so he doesnt get good ones looks like a poor revenge for me.
|

November 22nd, 2007, 12:31 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 61
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Eliminating a scorched earther=poor sportsmans
Quote:
Ulf said:
i dont have the game yet. but from my point of view, from other games, i would rather say a scorched earth player is the bad mannered one.
i think it is bad mannered to delay and weaken a clear winner without having any chance to win yourself. pillaging your provinces so he doesnt get good ones looks like a poor revenge for me.
|
Eh, I don't like the tactics, but there are parallels in real life (Vlad the Impaler, for example). This is, technically, a war game. And I don't remember anyone coming up with a Geneva convention for this thing, so in my mind, anything goes. If the guy wants to destroy his nation so it's no good to you, all you can do is try to take it before he can complete the job. Poor sportsmanship? Maybe. But if his back is up against the wall and he has no hope, how can you really blame him?
|

December 10th, 2007, 02:30 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Eliminating a scorched earther=poor sportsmans
Dom3 is a "Highlander" game:
There can be only one.
Scorched Earth is more than just being annoying. If you are my (apparent) conqueror, why should I just let you? In fact, isn't it my DUTY to make things as hard as I can on you? What do you want, mere surrender?
Besides, maybe it isn't just you. I remember a game where my home lab was destroyed nearly every other turn, for no reason than just pure malice from the depths. Constantly rebuilding it was an immense drain on my cash, making me very weak at the start.
In the end, Scorched Earth is a tactic, just like any other. The fact that 'you don't like it' is just too bad. Pick another target then. "Knowing" that I am going to lose is no reason for me to lie down and take it.
Is it not my RESPONSIBILITY to fight to the end?
If so, then 'spoiling it for you' is the least of my worries.
Either way, you are going to get me. The difference is how hard I make it for you. If I make it easy then do not the other contenders have a claim of unfairness against me?
--H
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|