Adjudication on a NAP -edited please comment again

[Aezeal]

it's all about technicalities... that is how things are in politics, roleplayed or not. It's not a NAP, in the future people dealing with zenphos should just be very carefull about what has been said.. and what hasn't. IMHO that should always be the case though and I really don't blame Zenphos more than the other guy, there was an option without breaking any oaths or whatnot to attack the guy, it was in his favor so he did that.. happens a lot in this game.

[Wrana]

OT - also agree with idea of making # of globals in play an option. Especially as there are slightly more possible globals now as well...

[crumply]

Adjudication:

From a legal perspective (why not), and without thinking about it to deeply (which would be kinda dumb), there was no agreement.

An agreement consists of mutual consent, evidenced by an offer and acceptance. Your situation displays and offer (3 NAP), a counter-offer (2 NAP), which is also a rejection of the initial offer, followed by silence. Silence never constitutes acceptance (if it did, think about the effect of failing to decline all those junk mail offers). Thus, no agreement.

Frankly, I think your opponent is being sort of an obnoxious boob.