|
|
|
 |
|

October 4th, 2007, 05:17 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
With the next patch just around the corner, how about we wait and see what changes have been made and how they affect MA Mictlan? Just on the basis of the progress page, v3.08 MA Mictlan and the next version of the same nation seem radically different.
If these things are the same after the patch and are a problem, then it would be good idea to look at it again. Besides that, not all units are supposed to be the equal of all others, so a one on one comparison to an Agarthan Oracle for example is inappropriate. It's how MA Mictlan stacks up against MA Agartha as a whole which is the deciding factor.
|

October 4th, 2007, 05:27 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden, Ume�
Posts: 991
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
Anyone have a link to that page where you can see planned updates?
|

October 4th, 2007, 05:36 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
|

October 4th, 2007, 06:46 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 198
Thanks: 87
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
I usually check this page 3 times per day.
But this time...
3.10?
|

October 4th, 2007, 05:39 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
Changes suggested were modding changes. Not long, irritating coding changes. Adding Misc slots for example. That said, I was not aware how close the patch was to release.
|

October 4th, 2007, 05:42 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
Not a problem. Feedback is welcome and you seem to be new here, so don't worry. Just pointed out why a bit more patience is good, but Kristoffer beat me to it.
Oh, and welcome to the forums for my part as well, Lord_Bob. 
|

October 4th, 2007, 05:53 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
i haven't used the coatl yet, but am certainly planning to - mostly for those reasons kristoffer listed above. they're flying battlefield spell platforms 
|

October 4th, 2007, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
Quote:
archaeolept said:
i haven't used the coatl yet, but am certainly planning to - mostly for those reasons kristoffer listed above. they're flying battlefield spell platforms
|
I love flying mages. Highly mobile battlefield worthy mages make reinforcing your armies as needed much easier. They also retreat instantly, helping to keep them alive when the army routes.
Jazzepi
|

October 4th, 2007, 07:35 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Hidden Grove
Posts: 377
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
Flying communions are pretty sweet. They are perhaps not as effective as teleporting, but they are cheaper and won't set off domes.
Edit: Are the changes to the Couatl just to the MA Mictlan ones?
__________________
Learn about Lizard Chariots and Serpent Dancers in the Guide to EA C'tis
|

October 4th, 2007, 11:08 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictilan MA->Couatl
Heh. Yeah. I remember when Pythium teleported a bunch of mages into my province- the one where I had a Dome of Flaming Death up. Nothing is as tasty as 10 fried mages.
So... not setting off domes is good.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|